Welcome to the Generative Justice Wiki


Introduction

In his late writings[1] Marx contrasted the alienation of labor value in mass production with the gift economy of indigenous cultures, where value is generated and circulated in meaningful, collaborative exchange with both human and nonhuman partners.[2] Marx failed to move beyond his top-down economic vision, but new opportunities have now arisen for the bottom-up generation and circulation of value in unalienated forms: peer-to-peer[3] production such as open source software; community based agroecology; restorative justice; and "DIY citizenship"[4] ranging from feminist makerspaces to queer biohacking have profoundly transformed the possibilities. Thus we can apply the "unalienated value" concept to nonhuman (ecological) value, as well as the "expressive" value in free speech, sexuality, spirituality, and other generative performance. In sum, we can define generative justice as follows:

The universal right to generate unalienated value and directly participate in its benefits; the rights of value generators to create their own conditions of production; and the rights of communities of value generation to nurture self-sustaining paths for its circulation.
external image 2By4mSwNDuTe-NS6YASTwxWLnKNZvtKcfwxAEQLHQUXPQAP1A_awpQTGAOfy6LroaWN79z0rgNfgyMJwscBICL6z7tb22uNC-VQsIIDMYFLoOz5CFwTo5h9_AdgtwcPgRkgXBB0
Generative justice in a traditional Iroquois economy: double lines represent unalienated value flow.
external image zQXJwToalCGTJNVtC1J1cpgrQjujX95Ed_Ws94bfsXtCI3KV5OOZXu0AXJ4oYCe0_4TaSHKFqW9N0ushorKf7-QXz2PVrTLMn30c_gXSddHo6qJqE4QQIquVWZ5n1KCbDzjB39o
Generative and exploitative cycles in the Arduino open source network: single lines indicate alienated value; double lines for unalienated value flow.
Our introduction to generative justice compares the traditional Iroquois (Haudenosaunee) economy with the production networks for Arduino, an open source microprocessor platform used by many social justice activists and environmentalists as well as by small scale entrepreneurs. While the Arduino system includes alienated value production (single lines), its prospects for a flourishing of unalienated value include both non-profit and for-profit forms.

In general, one can approach a generative justice analysis as follows:

1. Identify what generates unalienated value. Traditionally we think of human labor as generating value, but in fields such as STS we have to account for nonhuman value generation. For most indigenous cultures, value is generated by a spiritual interdependence of nature and community; for software developers value emerges from their interactions with a digital ecosystem of people and technologies; for many cooks value is tied to gustatory sensuality, and so on. In many cases the challenge is facilitate recognition of the value that has already been created--for example the "cultural capital" of built or living environments, the social justice work from prior generations of a community, etc.--and to make that more "liquid," i.e. accessible in new forms, without losing its unalienated character.

2. Identify the threats from extraction of value. Generative justice is a critique of any extraction of value, whether that is capitalist corporation, communist state, or internal, bottom-up domination (e.g. sexism in a makerspace). Value extraction for nature means soils are depleted, oceans are over-fished, and so on. Value extraction for workers, artists, athletes, scientists, parents, and so on all take different forms.

3. Identify ways in which extraction can be replaced by generative circulation. For organic gardening, "generative circulation" means that plant and food "waste" are composted back to the soil; so the flow of value is more local. For open source software, "generative circulation" means that source code is released to the public domain, so that the flow of value is more accessible. In all cases, the crucial feature is its circular flow, from the generators of value, back to the generators of value.

More discussion can be found in our papers and presentations page.
  1. ^
    Yang, M. (2012). Specter of the Commons: Karl Marx, Lewis Henry Morgan, and Nineteenth-Century European Stadialism. Borderlands 11(2).
  2. ^ TallBear, K. (2015). "Dossier: Theorizing Queer Inhumanisms: An Indigenous Reflection on Working Beyond the Human/Not Human," GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, Vol. 21(2-3), 230-235.
  3. ^ Kostakis, Vasilis, and Michel Bauwens. 2014. Network Society and Future Scenarios for a Collaborative Economy. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  4. ^ Ratto, M., Boler, M., & Deibert, R. (2014). DIY Citizenship: Critical Making and Social Media. MIT Press.